Malaysia vs Thailand: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Malaysia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
1st
Thailand rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Malaysia
- Thailand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Malaysia or Thailand?
- Malaysia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Malaysia and Thailand?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Thailand rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.