Namibia vs Samoa: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)

Namibia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia rank
1st
Samoa rank
1st

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time

  • Namibia
  • Samoa
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 184 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Namibia or Samoa?
Namibia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Namibia and Samoa?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Samoa?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Samoa rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
Namibia ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,116 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.