North Macedonia vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
North Macedonia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- North Macedonia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), North Macedonia or Papua New Guinea?
- North Macedonia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.