Papua New Guinea vs Samoa: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Papua New Guinea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Samoa rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Samoa
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Papua New Guinea or Samoa?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Papua New Guinea and Samoa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Samoa rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.