Sudan vs Switzerland: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Sudan
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Switzerland
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan rank
1st
Switzerland rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Sudan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Sudan or Switzerland?
- Sudan, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Sudan and Switzerland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and Switzerland rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Sudan ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.