Ecuador vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh)
Ecuador
11.9 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
11.7 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador rank
126th
Chinese Taipei rank
129th
Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) over time
- Ecuador
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 11.9 DB16-20 methodology against 11.7 DB16-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.2 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Ecuador ranks 126th and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 187 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh), Ecuador or Chinese Taipei?
- Ecuador, at 11.9 DB16-20 methodology against 11.7 DB16-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh) between Ecuador and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.2 DB16-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Chinese Taipei?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh)?
- Ecuador ranks 126th and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The price of electricity is measured in U.S. cents per kWh. A monthly electricity consumption is assumed, for which a bill is then computed for a warehouse based in the largest business city of the economy for the month of March. The bill is then expressed back as a unit of kWh. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.