Indonesia vs South Korea: Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh)
Indonesia
10.9 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea
11.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
134th
South Korea rank
131st
Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) over time
- Indonesia
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 11.4 DB16-20 methodology against 10.9 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0.5 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 134th and South Korea ranks 131st of 187 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh), Indonesia or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 11.4 DB16-20 methodology against 10.9 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh) between Indonesia and South Korea?
- 0.5 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh)?
- Indonesia ranks 134th and South Korea ranks 131st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The price of electricity is measured in U.S. cents per kWh. A monthly electricity consumption is assumed, for which a bill is then computed for a warehouse based in the largest business city of the economy for the month of March. The bill is then expressed back as a unit of kWh. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.