Latvia vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh)
Latvia
11.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
11.7 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
131st
Chinese Taipei rank
129th
Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) over time
- Latvia
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 11.7 DB16-20 methodology against 11.4 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0.3 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 131st and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh), Latvia or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 11.7 DB16-20 methodology against 11.4 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh) between Latvia and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.3 DB16-20 methodology, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Chinese Taipei?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh)?
- Latvia ranks 131st and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The price of electricity is measured in U.S. cents per kWh. A monthly electricity consumption is assumed, for which a bill is then computed for a warehouse based in the largest business city of the economy for the month of March. The bill is then expressed back as a unit of kWh. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.