San Marino vs South Africa: Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh)
San Marino
15.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
16.1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
95th
South Africa rank
92nd
Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) over time
- San Marino
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 16.1 DB16-20 methodology against 15.5 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0.6 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh), San Marino or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 16.1 DB16-20 methodology against 15.5 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh) between San Marino and South Africa?
- 0.6 DB16-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and South Africa rank globally for getting electricity: price of electricity (us cents per kwh)?
- San Marino ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The price of electricity is measured in U.S. cents per kWh. A monthly electricity consumption is assumed, for which a bill is then computed for a warehouse based in the largest business city of the economy for the month of March. The bill is then expressed back as a unit of kWh. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.