Afghanistan vs Congo, Dem. Rep.: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Afghanistan
50
in 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.
50
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
134th
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
134th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 50 against 50 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 134th and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Congo, Dem. Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 50 33.33 Afghanistan
2010s 51.67 50 1.67 Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Afghanistan or Congo, Dem. Rep.?
Afghanistan, at 50 against 50 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Afghanistan and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Afghanistan and Congo, Dem. Rep. rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 134th and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.