Antigua and Barbuda vs Philippines: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
83.33
in 2019
Philippines
83.33
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
30th
Philippines rank
30th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Philippines
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Philippines ranks 30th of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 83.33 0
2010s 83.33 83.33 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Philippines?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Philippines?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Philippines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Philippines rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Philippines ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.