Antigua and Barbuda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
83.33
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
83.33
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
30th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.