Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Azerbaijan
66.67
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina
66.67
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
76th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 16.67 | 16.67 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 36.67 | 66.67 | 30 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Azerbaijan, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.