Belgium vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Belgium
50
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
50
in 2019
Belgium rank
134th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
134th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
01020304050200920142019

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 134th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 50 33.33 16.67 Belgium
2010s 50 43.33 6.67 Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Belgium or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Belgium, at 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Belgium and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Belgium ranks 134th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.