Bolivia vs Central African Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Bolivia
33.33
in 2019
Central African Republic
33.33
in 2019
Bolivia rank
163rd
Central African Republic rank
163rd
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bolivia
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 163rd and Central African Republic ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 33.33 | 16.67 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 20 | 33.33 | 13.33 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Bolivia or Central African Republic?
- Bolivia, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Bolivia and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Central African Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Central African Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Bolivia ranks 163rd and Central African Republic ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.