Brunei Darussalam vs Slovak Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
66.67
in 2019
Slovak Republic
66.67
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
76th
Slovak Republic rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Slovak Republic has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 76th and Slovak Republic ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 66.67 | 16.67 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 55 | 66.67 | 11.67 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Slovak Republic?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Slovak Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Slovak Republic?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Slovak Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Slovak Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 76th and Slovak Republic ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.