Cape Verde vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Cape Verde
50
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
50
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
135th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
135th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 50 against 50 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 135th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 50 | 16.67 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 35 | 50 | 15 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Cape Verde or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Cape Verde, at 50 against 50 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 135th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.