Canada vs Central African Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Canada
33.33
in 2019
Central African Republic
33.33
in 2019
Canada rank
163rd
Central African Republic rank
163rd

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Canada
  • Central African Republic
0102030200920142019

How they compare

Canada currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 163rd and Central African Republic ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 33.33 0
2010s 33.33 33.33 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Canada or Central African Republic?
Canada, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Canada and Central African Republic?
0, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Central African Republic?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Canada and Central African Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Canada ranks 163rd and Central African Republic ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.