Central African Republic vs Dominican Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
33.33
in 2019
Dominican Republic
33.33
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
164th
Dominican Republic rank
164th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 164th and Dominican Republic ranks 164th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Dominican Republic?
- Central African Republic, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Dominican Republic?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Dominican Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Dominican Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 164th and Dominican Republic ranks 164th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.