China (People’s Republic of) vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
100
in 2019
Hong Kong (China)
100
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
1st
Hong Kong (China) rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 100 against 100 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Hong Kong (China) has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 83.33 | 16.67 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2010s | 69.58 | 90 | 20.42 | Hong Kong (China) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Hong Kong (China)?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 100 against 100 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Hong Kong (China)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.