Comoros vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Comoros
100
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
100
in 2019
Comoros rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 100 against 100 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 100 100 0
2010s 100 100 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Comoros or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Comoros, at 100 against 100 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Comoros ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.