Democratic Republic of Congo vs Moldova: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
50
in 2019
Moldova
50
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
135th
Moldova rank
135th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Moldova
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 50 against 50 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 135th and Moldova ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 16.67 | 33.33 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 50 | 40 | 10 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Moldova?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 50 against 50 in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 135th and Moldova ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.