Congo, Rep. vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Congo, Rep.
50
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
50
in 2019
Congo, Rep. rank
134th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
134th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
01020304050200920142019

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 134th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.

Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 50 33.33 16.67 Congo, Rep.
2010s 50 43.33 6.67 Congo, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Congo, Rep. or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Congo, Rep., at 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Congo, Rep. and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Congo, Rep. and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 134th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.