Costa Rica vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Costa Rica
66.67
in 2019
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
66.67
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
76th
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 76th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mauritania, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Costa Rica or Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- Costa Rica, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Costa Rica and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 76th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.