Egypt, Arab Rep. vs Equatorial Guinea: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Egypt, Arab Rep.
66.67
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
66.67
in 2019
Egypt, Arab Rep. rank
75th
Equatorial Guinea rank
75th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Egypt, Arab Rep.
  • Equatorial Guinea
0204060200920142019

How they compare

Egypt, Arab Rep. currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Egypt, Arab Rep. ranks 75th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt, Arab Rep. Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 66.67 0
2010s 66.67 66.67 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Egypt, Arab Rep. or Equatorial Guinea?
Egypt, Arab Rep., at 66.67 against 66.67 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Egypt, Arab Rep. and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Egypt, Arab Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Rep. and Equatorial Guinea?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Egypt, Arab Rep. and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Egypt, Arab Rep. ranks 75th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.