El Salvador vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
El Salvador
50
in 2019
Kazakhstan, Republic of
50
in 2019
El Salvador rank
135th
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
135th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 50 against 50 in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
El Salvador ranks 135th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 135th of 190 countries.
Kazakhstan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 50 | 16.67 | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 35 | 43.33 | 8.33 | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, El Salvador or Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- El Salvador, at 50 against 50 in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between El Salvador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan, Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 135th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 135th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.