Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
66.67
in 2019
Estonia
66.67
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
75th
Estonia rank
75th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Estonia
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Estonia, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th and Estonia ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 83.33 16.67 Estonia
2010s 66.67 71.67 5 Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Estonia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Estonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Estonia rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th and Estonia ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.