Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
66.67
in 2019
New Zealand
66.67
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
76th
New Zealand rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- New Zealand
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or New Zealand?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 66.67 against 66.67 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and New Zealand?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.