Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs South Africa: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
66.67
in 2019
South Africa
66.67
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
76th
South Africa rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- South Africa
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 76th and South Africa ranks 76th of 190 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 68.33 | 1.67 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or South Africa?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 66.67 against 66.67 in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and South Africa?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and South Africa rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 76th and South Africa ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.