Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Georgia
100
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
100
in 2019
Georgia rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 100 against 100 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Georgia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 83.33 | 16.67 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 90 | 3.33 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Georgia or Hong Kong, China?
- Georgia, at 100 against 100 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.