Georgia vs Micronesia, Fed. Sts.: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Georgia
100
in 2019
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
100
in 2019
Georgia rank
1st
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 100 against 100 in Micronesia, Fed. Sts., a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Micronesia, Fed. Sts. has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 1st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Micronesia, Fed. Sts. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Micronesia, Fed. Sts. Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 100 33.33 Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
2010s 93.33 100 6.67 Micronesia, Fed. Sts.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Georgia or Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
Georgia, at 100 against 100 in Micronesia, Fed. Sts. as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Georgia and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Georgia ranks 1st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.