Georgia vs North Macedonia: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Georgia
100
in 2019
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
Georgia rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • North Macedonia
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 100 against 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Georgia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 83.33 16.67 North Macedonia
2010s 93.33 93.33 0 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Georgia or North Macedonia?
Georgia, at 100 against 100 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Georgia and North Macedonia?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and North Macedonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Georgia and North Macedonia rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Georgia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.