Georgia vs United Kingdom: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Georgia
100
in 2019
United Kingdom
100
in 2019
Georgia rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • United Kingdom
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 100 against 100 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Georgia ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 188 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 83.33 16.67 United Kingdom
2010s 93.33 95 1.67 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Georgia or United Kingdom?
Georgia, at 100 against 100 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Georgia and United Kingdom?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Kingdom?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Georgia and United Kingdom rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Georgia ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.