Guinea-Bissau vs Nigeria: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
33.33
in 2019
Nigeria
33.33
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
163rd
Nigeria rank
163rd

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Nigeria
0102030200920142019

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 163rd and Nigeria ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 0 33.33 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 33.33 5 28.33 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Nigeria?
Guinea-Bissau, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Nigeria as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 163rd and Nigeria ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.