Guinea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Guinea
83.33
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
83.33
in 2019
Guinea rank
30th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
30th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guinea
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th of 188 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 83.33 16.67 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 80 83.33 3.33 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Guinea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Guinea, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.