Hungary vs Marshall Islands: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Hungary
66.67
in 2019
Marshall Islands
66.67
in 2019
Hungary rank
75th
Marshall Islands rank
75th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Hungary
  • Marshall Islands
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 75th and Marshall Islands ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 66.67 16.67 Hungary
2010s 75 66.67 8.33 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Hungary or Marshall Islands?
Hungary, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Hungary and Marshall Islands?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Marshall Islands?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Hungary and Marshall Islands rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Hungary ranks 75th and Marshall Islands ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.