India vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
India
92.17
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
83.33
in 2019
India rank
29th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- India
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
India currently reports 92.17 against 83.33 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 8.84.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
India ranks 29th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 83.33 | 33.33 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 70.2 | 83.33 | 13.13 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, India or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- India, at 92.17 against 83.33 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between India and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8.84, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do India and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- India ranks 29th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.