Iran, Islamic Rep. vs Malawi: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Iran, Islamic Rep.
50
in 2019
Malawi
50
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
134th
Malawi rank
134th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
  • Malawi
01020304050200920142019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 50 against 50 in Malawi, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 134th of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Rep. Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 50 16.67 Malawi
2010s 43.33 50 6.67 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Iran, Islamic Rep. or Malawi?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 50 against 50 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi?
0, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Iran, Islamic Rep. and Malawi rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 134th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.