Kosovo vs Micronesia, Fed. Sts.: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Kosovo
33.33
in 2019
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
100
in 2019
Kosovo rank
1st
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kosovo
- Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
How they compare
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. currently reports 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 66.67.
That makes Micronesia, Fed. Sts.'s figure about 3.0 times Kosovo's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Micronesia, Fed. Sts. has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 1st of 1 countries.
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Micronesia, Fed. Sts. | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 100 | 66.67 | Micronesia, Fed. Sts. |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 100 | 66.67 | Micronesia, Fed. Sts. |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Kosovo or Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- Micronesia, Fed. Sts., at 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Kosovo and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- 66.67, with Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 1st of 1 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.