Kosovo vs Saudi Arabia: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Kosovo
33.33
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
100
in 2019
Kosovo rank
1st
Saudi Arabia rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Kosovo
  • Saudi Arabia
406080100200920142019

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 66.67.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 3.0 times Kosovo's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 1 groups.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 66.67 33.33 Saudi Arabia
2010s 33.33 70 36.67 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Kosovo or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Kosovo and Saudi Arabia?
66.67, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Saudi Arabia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Kosovo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Kosovo ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.