Kyrgyz Republic vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Kyrgyz Republic
33.33
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
33.33
in 2019
Kyrgyz Republic rank
164th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
164th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyz Republic ranks 164th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 164th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyz Republic | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Kyrgyz Republic or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Kyrgyz Republic and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyz Republic and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyz Republic and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Kyrgyz Republic ranks 164th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 164th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.