Malaysia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Malaysia
100
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
100
in 2019
Malaysia rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100 against 100 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 100 | 16.67 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 86.67 | 100 | 13.33 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Malaysia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Malaysia, at 100 against 100 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Malaysia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.