Micronesia (country) vs Russia: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Micronesia (country)
100
in 2019
Russia
100
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
Russia rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Russia
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 100 against 100 in Russia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Russia ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Russia Difference Ahead
2000s 100 0 100 Micronesia (country)
2010s 100 66.67 33.33 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Micronesia (country) or Russia?
Micronesia (country), at 100 against 100 in Russia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Micronesia (country) and Russia?
0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Russia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Russia rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Russia ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.