Micronesia (country) vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Micronesia (country)
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 83.33 | 16.67 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 100 | 95 | 5 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Micronesia (country) or United Arab Emirates?
- Micronesia (country), at 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.