North Macedonia vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 190 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 95 | 1.67 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, North Macedonia or United Arab Emirates?
- North Macedonia, at 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.