North Macedonia, Republic of vs United Kingdom: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
North Macedonia, Republic of
100
in 2019
United Kingdom
100
in 2019
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- North Macedonia, Republic of
- United Kingdom
How they compare
North Macedonia, Republic of currently reports 100 against 100 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 190 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia, Republic of | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 95 | 1.67 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, North Macedonia, Republic of or United Kingdom?
- North Macedonia, Republic of, at 100 against 100 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between North Macedonia, Republic of and United Kingdom?
- 0, with North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia, Republic of and United Kingdom?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia, Republic of and United Kingdom rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.