Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Papua New Guinea
83.33
in 2019
Poland
83.33
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
30th
Poland rank
30th

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Poland
020406080200920142019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 30th and Poland ranks 30th of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 50 33.33 Papua New Guinea
2010s 83.33 73.33 10 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Papua New Guinea or Poland?
Papua New Guinea, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Poland as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Papua New Guinea and Poland?
0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Poland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Papua New Guinea and Poland rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Papua New Guinea ranks 30th and Poland ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.