South Africa vs Syrian Arab Republic: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
South Africa
66.67
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
66.67
in 2019
South Africa rank
76th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
76th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
South Africa ranks 76th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 76th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 68.33 | 66.67 | 1.67 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, South Africa or Syrian Arab Republic?
- South Africa, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between South Africa and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- South Africa ranks 76th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.