Saint Kitts and Nevis vs United Republic of Tanzania: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
83.33
in 2019
United Republic of Tanzania
83.33
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
30th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 83.33 against 83.33 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.