Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
83.33
in 2019
Uzbekistan
83.33
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
30th
Uzbekistan rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 33.33 | 50 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 48.33 | 35 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Uzbekistan?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.